Text-to-Video

Composite performance across 1 benchmarks · Normalized 0–100 · At least 1 scores required · Ranked by average performance

#	Model	Provider	AA T2V	Avg	Coverage	Price	Value
1	Wan 3.0	Alibaba	1,134	100.0	1/1	$0.10/s	1000.0
2	MiniMax H3 (768p)	MiniMax	1,121	96.1	1/1	—	—
3	Minimax H3 Max (Based on MiniMax H3)	Fal	1,117	94.9	1/1	—	—
4	Dreamina Seedance 2.5	ByteDance Seed	1,105	91.2	1/1	$0.23/s	394.6
5	FLUX 3	Black Forest Labs	1,095	88.2	1/1	—	—
6	Dreamina Seedance 2.0	ByteDance Seed	1,084	84.9	1/1	—	—
7	Gemini Omni Flash 1.1	Google	1,072	81.3	1/1	—	—
8	Agnes-Video-2.5	Sapiens AI	1,053	75.5	1/1	—	—
9	HappyHorse-1.1	Alibaba	1,041	71.9	1/1	$0.099/s	727.7
10	HappyHorse-1.0	Alibaba	1,037	70.7	1/1	$0.099/s	715.6
11	Grok Imagine Video 1.5	SpaceXAI	1,036	70.4	1/1	$0.14/s	502.9
12	Wan2.7-260612	Alibaba	1,023	66.5	1/1	$0.10/s	665.0
13	MAGI-2 Preview	Sand.ai	1,011	62.8	1/1	—	—
14	Kling 3.0 1080p (Pro)	KlingAI	1,000	59.5	1/1	$0.11/s	531.3
15	PixVerse V6	PixVerse	998	58.9	1/1	$0.040/s	1472.5
16	Kling 3.0 Omni 1080p (Pro)	KlingAI	984	54.7	1/1	$0.11/s	488.4
17	Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite	SpaceXAI	980	53.5	1/1	$0.030/s	1783.3
18	Veo 3.1	Google	961	47.7	1/1	$0.20/s	238.5
19	Veo 3.1 Fast	Google	960	47.4	1/1	$0.080/s	592.5
20	Veo 3.1 Lite	Google	945	42.9	1/1	$0.030/s	1430.0
21	LTX-2.5 Fast	Lightricks	931	38.7	1/1	$0.090/s	430.0
22	LTX-2.5 Pro	Lightricks	929	38.1	1/1	$0.12/s	317.5
23	Runway Gen-4.5	Runway	912	32.9	1/1	$0.12/s	274.2
24	Vidu Q3 Turbo	Vidu	900	29.3	1/1	$0.055/s	532.7
25	Vidu Q3 Pro	Vidu	899	29.0	1/1	$0.10/s	290.0
26	Kling O1 Pro (January)	KlingAI	885	24.8	1/1	$0.11/s	221.4
27	LTX-2.3 Fast	Lightricks	845	12.7	1/1	$0.030/s	423.3
28	LTX-2.3 Pro	Lightricks	838	10.6	1/1	$0.040/s	265.0
29	Pika 2.5	Pika Art	838	10.6	1/1	—	—
30	Boreal	Creatify	822	5.7	1/1	—	—
31	P-Video	Pruna AI	803	0.0	1/1	$0.020/s	—

Wan 3.0 leads on raw performance, but Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite delivers 78% more performance per dollar. That extra 46.5 points costs $0.002/s per point.

Access this data

JSON GET /api/v1

[
  {
    "rank": 1,
    "model": "Wan 3.0",
    "provider": "Alibaba",
    "avg_score": 100.0,
    "cost": 0.1,
    "cost_unit": "video_second",
    "value": 1000.0
  },
  {
    "rank": 2,
    "model": "MiniMax H3 (768p)",
    "provider": "MiniMax",
    "avg_score": 96.1,
    "cost": null,
    "cost_unit": "video_second",
    "value": null
  },
  {
    "rank": 3,
    "model": "Minimax H3 Max (Based on MiniMax H3)",
    "provider": "Fal",
    "avg_score": 94.9,
    "cost": null,
    "cost_unit": "video_second",
    "value": null
  }
]

Curl

$ curl -s https://rightrank.ai/api/v1/rankings/text-to-video.json | jq '.[:3]'

CLI brew install rightrank

$ rightrank top text-to-video --limit 5
$ rightrank compare claude-opus-4.6 gpt-5.4-pro --category text-to-video
$ rightrank value text-to-video  # best performance per dollar

Claude Code Skill Skill

# In Claude Code, use the RightRank skill:
/rightrank best model for text-to-video
/rightrank compare top 5 by value
/rightrank cheapest model scoring above 80 on text-to-video